7mm vs 270 wsm

PowerShell, TFS/VSTS Build and Release – There is more than meets the eye
January 8, 2018

7mm vs 270 wsm

If you’re using the two cartridges at ranges less than a quarter-mile, the trajectory difference is negligible, but the .270 WSM does have the advantage of utilizing a shorter action than the .270 Win. Of these, 140 grain, 150 grain, 160 grain, and 175 grain loads are by far the most common. Again, probably not. Following the immediate success of the .300 WSM in 2001, the .270 and 7mm WSM were introduced in 2002. Is it significantly more accurate than the .270 Winchester? .270 versus 7mm Rem Mag. CVA Paramount Muzzleloader: Read This Before You Buy One! Many of the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges in the United States, like the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield (both of which have an overall length 3.34″), require the use of what is commonly referred to as a “standard action” or “long-action” rifle. While there is a big overlap in bullet weights the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag can use (both cartridges are commonly loaded with bullets in the 180 grain to 250 grain range), the .338 Win Mag generally leans a little heavier than the 325 WSM. Additionally, the .300 Win Mag has a shoulder moved further forward than the 7mm Rem Mag. Mag. Below you can see the differences between the 325 Winchester Magnum and the .338 Winchester Short Magnum in terms of external dimensions. The table below compares the recoil produced by two Nosler hand loads (available here and here) with ballistics roughly comparable to the 140gr loads above for those cartridges when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. In short, this rifle and cartridge come about as close to being the mythical, all-round North American big game rig as the 270, 30-06, 7mm Rem. Finally, the two cartridges use the same .308″ diameter bullets and there is a big overlap in typical bullet weights for each cartridge. I’m not sure if it cracks the  Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year, but it’s likely in the Top 15 or Top 20. That said, while the 325 WSM is quite popular in some circles, it is not nearly as widely used and cannot hold a candle to the .338 Win Mag in that area. However, the 8mm bullets (.323″) used by the 325 WSM (as well as the 8mm Mauser, 8mm Rem Mag, and 8×68 S) are not nearly as easy to find in the United States. However, regardless of the firearm in question, rifles chambered in .270 Winchester can usually hold an extra round or two in the magazine since that cartridge has a slimmer case. Additionally, the 7mm Remington Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 7mm WSM has a rebated rim and no belt. However, even though the .338 Win Mag (like the 7mm Rem Mag and .300 Win Mag) is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester, the 325 WSM still has a much fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees). Rifles and ammo are widely available for both guns, but with an almost 80-year head start you’ll encounter more .270 Win. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. But at the opposite-and-equal-reaction end of that recoil is the bullet carrying 3,850 ft-lbs kinetic energy. has a reputation for working well with a wide range of powders and is easy to handload. I picked a bullet type and grain weight that was very similar and did a comparision on the Federal web site. RifleShooter Digital Staff - April 20, 2020. They’re both great cartridges and I’d personally say that the 325 WSM is the second most appealing choice out of the Winchester Short Magnum line (behind the 300WSM). The 270 Winchester remains one of his favorites, but it's sharing field time with several 6.5 Creedmoors and other 6.5mms. The same goes for game like mountain goat, bighorn sheep, Himalayan Tahr, and chamois. The 270 Winchester Short Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. The .270 WSM, as I mentioned, does generate better ballistics than the old .270. They rounded out the lineup with the 325 Winchester Short Magnum in 2005. Interestingly enough, a .323″ bullet diameter is exactly halfway between the .308″ bullets used by the 300 WSM and .300 Win Mag on one hand, and the .338″ bullets used by the .338 Win Mag on the other. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .300 Win Mag and 300 WSM are widely available. Maybe, but I doubt that it’s a big enough difference to really matter. So with that said, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with the 300 WSM either I understand why other hunters prefer the 300 WSM. The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. However, Winchester did produce several versions of their Model 70 chambered in the cartridge for many years. The 300 Winchester Short Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. However, both Nosler and Winchester manufacture their Trophy Grade and Power Max Bonded lines of ammunition in both cartridges. First, the .300 Win Mag is a lot longer. Once again, the 7mm WSM has a little bit less wind drift, but it’s an extremely small difference between them that’s due entirely to the slightly faster muzzle velocity of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge. More on this in a minute, but it’s worth noting that for those two AccuBond loads in particular, the 325 WSM has almost 95% of the kinetic energy of the .338 Win Mag and has essentially the same trajectory out to 200 yards. In today’s world, better to sugar coat it than to sound like we may be mocking. Comments are turned off. Caliber: Bullet Weight: Overall Cartridge Length: Muzzle Velocity: Trajectory at 300 yds(100yds zero) Muzzle Energy(Ft. Remember: we’re talking about accuracy under practical hunting conditions, not benchrest shooting where a .1″ or .2″ improvement in group size can make a big difference. Use A Thermacell To Stop Bug Bites While Hunting & Camping. In fact, depending on the exact brand of factory ammo we’re talking about (like Barnes VOR-TX), the 300 WSM may have a faster published velocity. Anyhow, I like the concept of the wsm family of cartridges. In terms of trajectory, the newer cartridge has an edge, but it’s relatively minor. Absolutely. The Lyman 50th Edition (p197-198, 199-200, 214-216, 219-220,257-259, 260-262, 288-289, 294-295) and Hornady 10th Edition (p351-359, 356-359, 406-411, 412-416, 564-573, 574-585, 637-639, 659-664) reloading manuals were used as references for the history of the cartridges. The 325 WSM is an attractive choice for hunters in the niches I described above and those that use the cartridge generally seem to absolutely love it. However, the 325 Winchester Short Magnum doesn’t have a closely related standard length cousin that’s widely used in North America. Getting a 7mm WSM ballistically does not get you any advantage over a regular 7mm Remington magnum. For those reasons, the .300 Win Mag actually has significantly more case capacity (around 10-15% more, depending on the manufacturer) than the 300 WSM. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. Though it’s possible to find rifles chambered in .300 Win Mag with a larger magazine, that’s a pretty typical magazine size for the cartridge. The.270 WSM is a good cartridge but, honestly, it is a very small player in terms of market share. On the other hand, that’s not a gigantic advantage in favor of the 270 WSM either. Is it significantly more accurate than the 7mm Remington Magnum? The 325 WSM shoots .323″ bullets while the .338 Win Mag uses .338″ bullets. The .300 Win Mag is a bit more widely adopted, but you probably won’t have any issues finding a nice rifle chambered in 300 WSM either. Seventy-six years after the .270 broke cover Winchester launched the .300 WSM, and a year later in 2002 Winchester unveiled the .270 WSM. The .270 Winchester and 270 WSM (along with the .270 Weatherby and the 6.8 SPC) use the same .277″ diameter bullets. If you already have a rifle in the cartridge and don’t mind the smaller selection of factory ammo (or if you’re into handloading), the 7mm WSM will also serve you very well as a hunting cartridge. However, the .270 Win.’s long case body feeds easily in most rifles while the WSM has a reputation for being more finicky. In 1925 Winchester necked down the .30-03 to .277 and created the .270 Win., a sporting cartridge designed for medium-size game that shot flatter yet recoiled less than the .30-06 Springfield. Overall, the .338 AccuBond load is the best here with the 325 WSM AccuBond coming in a relatively close second. The Hornady .300 Win Mag shoots a little bit flatter due to its faster muzzle velocity, but the difference between them is so small that it’s probably not even worth considering. The situation with rifles in is pretty similar. However, standard/long actions and short actions are two of the most common and are most relevant to the development of the Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges. It’s not a gigantic difference, but this often means that the 270 WSM has a definite advantage in terms of external ballistics and sometimes slightly less recoil, but that the .270 Winchester is more often available in shorter, lighter, and easier to handle rifles. These three products from Horus Vision, a smartphone app, pocket weather meter and laser... Thompson/Center and S&W's Performance Center team up to build an entry-level long-range... Gunsite's Ed Head reviews the Ruger American/Robar Scout Rifle. Is the 325 WSM capable of excellent accuracy? This results in a little bit less recoil. I’d have to compare the ballistics to double check more energy at that range. As you can see, the two Federal Premium loads used the exact same 180 grain bullets fired at the same velocity. And, if you're a 7mm fan, don't overlook the deadly 7mm-08 Remington. None of them have covered any new ground. For this reason, this particular Model 70 in 270 WSM is actually longer (44″ vs 42.5″) and heavier (7.25 pounds vs 7 pounds) than the Model 70 in .270 Winchester. Additionally, the Winchester Short Magnum Cartridges all have a case with very minimal taper and a 35 degree shoulder. Just like with the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, even though the 325 WSM uses a case with a larger diameter, the .338 Win Mag itself has a relatively large diameter case and is significantly longer. First, let’s talk about the history of the Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) line of cartridges and what the company was trying to achieve. With this load, the .270 WSM generates roughly 250 additional foot-pounds of energy over its competitor at the muzzle when both cartridges are fired from 24-inch barrels. The 7mm WSM is similar to the .300 WSM with the case necked down to handle .284" bullets. Mag. In the WSM .270 fans found a short, powerful, efficient round that could be housed in compact, lightweight short-action rifles and which edged closer to 7mm Rem. With that in mind, you’re probably not giving up any potential magazine space by choosing a rifle chambered in 300 WSM with a 3 round magazine. The 325 WSM has similar ballistics to the magnum action, medium bore 8mm Remington Magnum and 8×68 S cartridges. 325 WSM vs 338 Win Mag Just put your shot were it needs to go. Even though you’re probably not giving up any magazine capacity due to the fat and stubby design of the 300 WSM cartridge, those same traits (along with the cartridge’s very steep shoulder angle) can sometimes present feeding problems. Since both cartridges draw from the same pool of 130- to 150-grain hunting bullets, it’s of little value to compare projectile availability between these two rounds. So, while the 7mm WSM is faster on paper, the two cartridges have essentially the same velocity for all intents and purposes. Tom Beckstrand and Neal Emery of Hornady highlight the 6MM Creedmoor ammo. Both are wonderful for situations like hunting mule deer in Arizona or pronghorn in Wyoming. At the same time, the 300 WSM is the most popular Winchester Short Magnum cartridge and is also extremely commonly used as well. It probably doesn’t crack the Top 10 list, but it’s close. They’re both great cartridges, but I’d probably lean towards the .270 Winchester. RifleShooter Magazine editor Scott Rupp breaks down all the features of the Mossberg Patriot Predator rifle chambered in 6.5 PRC. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. Far Zero for the WSM load and the 140 grain 7mm load is identical, while FZ of the heavy WSM load is 10 yards longer than the 160 grain 7mm. This is a benefit that should not be overlooked either. In this cartridge comparison, we are going to take a look two cartridges, the 7mm-08 Rem and the .270 Win. First, both have the same maximum SAAMI pressure of 65,000psi. The 7mm-08 case is just slightly longer than the parent .308—2.035 inches vs. 2.015 inches—but maintains the same 20-degree shoulder of the .308 Winchester. Just because it can be done does not mean it makes sense, despite what you might read in advertising copy. Now that we’ve covered the basic history and design of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges, let’s see how they compare to the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, 300 Winchester Magnum, and .338 Winchester Magnum. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Federal Premium and Hornady factory ammunition loaded with 180gr Trophy Bonded Tip (.500 BC) and 200gr Hornady ELD-X (.597 BC) bullets in .300 Winchester Magnum and 300 Winchester Short Magnum. It’s just that it doesn’t offer a significant improvement in power over the 325 WSM at close range, but still has more recoil. With the whims of the marketplace it may or may not stay readily available. This means that it’s possible to build a short action rifle that’s a tiny bit shorter and lighter than an otherwise identical rifle with a standard length action. Absolutely. The particular 300 WSM load above shoots the same weight bullet at very nearly the same muzzle velocity (over 99% as fast), but uses about 8.5% less powder. This is not an ironclad rule though and it’s sometimes possible to find rifles chambered in .338 Winchester Magnum that can accommodate another round or two compared to those chambered in 325 WSM. Normally you’d be right and the rifle for the standard length cartridge would be either a little longer and heavier or virtually the same size and weight. For instance, a current production Winchester Model 70 Sporter chambered in 325 WSM weighs about 7.25 pounds and has an overall length of 44.24″. However, while that factor may well contribute to better accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. Again, probably not. Additionally, the company also advertised that the shorter case used by the WSM cartridges resulted in superior accuracy and less recoil. Thanks for your support. There are a number of relatively inexpensive factory loads for the .270 Win. It also spawned an entire family of cartridges. The great thing about the WSM family is that converting one to another is easy if the others die off(270,300,325). I prefer the 700 in 7mm SAUM because it is SS and I generally prefer SS to CM in my "working" rifles, but they function equally well. As you can see, both AccuBond loads have similar ballistics, but the 325 WSM AccuBond load has a slightly flatter trajectory while the .338 Win Mag AccuBond load retains more kinetic energy at all ranges. He was originally going down to 6.5mm but changed his mind and went up to 7mm. As you can probably guess, there is very little difference in the trajectories in the two cartridges. The 7mm Remington Magnum is one of the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges in North America and is likely among the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States. For this reason, while they will do the job on deer sized game, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag are both excellent choices for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland. As fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out, the 325 Winchester Short Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. I'm struggling with the same issue. The situation is basically reversed when comparing the 220gr 325 WSM and 225gr 338 Win Mag. Both loads are compared when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. When comparing two loads with identical bullets (Hornady’s 145-grain Precision Hunter ELD-X), the .270 WSM is 130 fps faster than the .270 Win. Except the .270 WSM offers its performance from a shorter action, and does it with a shorter barrel. However, though Browning, Kimber, and Savage all manufactured 325 WSM rifles at one point, only Winchester currently offers current production rifles in the cartridge (the Model 70 and XPR at this point). However, there are many, many other factors that influence accuracy more than that one trait. What about accuracy of the 300 Win Mag vs 300 WSM? Lightweight handy rifles giving magnum performance should have become more popular. On the other hand, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge does not have a gigantic advantage in either category either and there’s actually a smaller difference in the ballistics of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag than there is with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester. Since those older cartridges already have such well established (and deserved) reputations, not to mention an abundant selection of quality rifles and ammunition, any new cartridge competing against them had better provide a significant advantage to convince enough people to make that switch. Those factors result in this particular 300 WSM load having about 7% less free recoil than the .300 Win Mag. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .270 Winchester and 270 WSM are widely available. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 270 WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. At reasonable shooting ranges, there’s very little practical difference between them ballistically and both cartridges will really do a number on both species of game. This specific model weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in both 325 WSM and .338 Winchester Magnum. Subscriber Services. What about when comparing bullets of the same or very similar weight? The recoil of some hard hitting cartridges. Inside of 200 yards no advantage. This results in less recoil. However, the 300 WSM is capable of attaining almost the same performance as the .300 Win Mag while using less powder. The .300 Winchester Magnum is extremely popular and is consistently among the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year. loads are typically a few cents cheaper per shot. This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. The last of these cartridges, the .325 WSM, was introduced in 2005. However, their .555″ case diameter is larger than those used by the 7mm Rem Mag and .300 Win Mag (.513″) as well as the .270 Winchester (.470″). Is it significantly more accurate than the .338 Winchester Magnum? On the other hand, the 300 WSM has a slightly higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the .300 Winchester Magnum (65,000psi vs 64,000psi). I used the Hornady Ballistic calculator and ShootersCalculator.com to compare trajectory, wind drift, and recoil for the cartridges. However, both cartridges are capable of excellent accuracy in the right hands and will get the job done under most circumstances if the shooter is up to the task. .300 Win Mag ammo is probably a little bit easier to find, it’s not by much and you’re likely to find a good selection of ammo for both cartridges regardless of where you go. While the performance of the two cartridges at reasonable hunting ranges is very similar, the logistics of getting a good rifle, quality ammunition, or even reloading components for the .388 Win Mag are so much simpler for that cartridge when compared to the 325 WSM. He loaded with Win brass, Fed 210M primers, H1000 and 180 gr Bergers. .222 Remington Rifle Cartridge – Family Portrait, Performance Center-Thompson/Center LRR Review, .17-Caliber Reloading Data and History for 5 Cartridges, Berger 30 Caliber 205 Grain Elite Hunter Bullet — New for 2020, .25-06 Rem. rifles than WSMs on used gun racks. For all intents and purposes, we can say that the two cartridges have the same ballistics. All RifleShooter subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. The 270 WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and more resistance to wind drift than the .270 Winchester. I went with the 325 to try something different for a change. All four loads used a 200 yard zero.Just like you’d expect, there is virtually no difference between the trajectory of each cartridge. The 7mm shoots .284-inch diameter bullets through bores .28-inch across, but only two use this Imperial measuring system in their titles: .280 Remington and .284 Winchester, both excellent but under-rated “standard” velocity cartridges. In fact, those two cartridges are likely among the Top 10 best … With that in mind, the 325 WSM is a better choice for situations where very large and tough game like sambar deer or moose are likely to be encountered at close range. However, while those that may well contribute to better accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. Though Winchester advertises a 24″ long barrel and a 7.25 pound overall weight for each cartridge in this particular Model 70, the rifle chambered in 325 WSM is 1/2″ shorter overall. So, not only is it possible to shave some length and weight off a rifle while retaining the same length barrel, but shorter actions also give the shooter an advantage from a shorter bolt throw (and a correspondingly faster cycling time) as well as a tiny advantage in accuracy due to their stiffer action. Exploring areas of concern that are vital for anyone who wants to increase a rifle's accuracy. While rifles chambered in both cartridges are manufactured with both 22″ and 24″ barrels, the shorter 22″ barrel length is more common with the .270 Winchester and the longer 24″ barrel is more common with the 270 WSM. However, Winchester made a big splash with the .300 Winchester Short Magnum in 2001 and followed up with the .270 Winchester Short Magnum and 7mm Winchester Short Magnum cartridges in 2002. Especially when hunting at shorter ranges (inside 200 yards), the 325 Winchester Short Magnum offers virtually the same performance as the .338 Win Mag, but with considerably less recoil. OSG's Lynn Burkhead and Ruger's Matt WIlson kick off SHOT Show 2018 by taking a look at the Ruger Predator. Is it significantly more accurate than the .300 Winchester Magnum? 6.5 Creedmoor vs 243 Winchester Review & Comparison, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 7mm-08 Remington Review & Comparison, 6.5 Grendel vs 308: Everything You Need To Know, Essential Muzzleloader Supplies Every Hunter Needs In 2020, The 300 Ultra Mag (300 RUM): Your Complete Guide, 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel: What You Need To Know, 6.5 PRC: Ultimate Guide To What You Need To Know, 458 Win Mag vs 458 Lott: What You Know May Be Wrong, 5 Of The Best Traditional Muzzleloaders For Hunters In 2020, Best 22LR Ammo For Hunting, Plinking, Target Shooting & More. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Federal Premium factory ammunition loaded with 130gr Trophy Bonded Tip (.44 BC) and 150gr Nosler Partition (.466 BC) bullets in .270 Winchester and 270 WSM. Additionally, the .338 Winchester Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 325 WSM has a rebated rim and no belt. Do the WSM cartridges offer tangible benefits to hunters and shooters? Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets. By David E. Petzal. The verdict? The 7mm WSM also has a higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the 7mm Remington Magnum (65,000psi vs 61,000psi). Well, the 200gr 325 WSM bullet starts off with a little bit less muzzle energy than the 200 grain .338 Win Mag bullet, but the 325 WSM is more aerodynamic and pulls ahead in the energy and trajectory departments at 100 yards and 300 yards respectively. However, though the 8×68 S is relatively popular in Europe, 8mm cartridges simply aren’t very popular in North America and neither cartridge is widely used on this side of the Atlantic. But off the top of my head it would seem to be the case. Proponents of the WSM cartridges also argue that this results in a shorter and wider powder column that’s more quickly ignited by the primer and burns more evenly than a comparable amount of powder in a longer and more narrow column. These are interesting cases where both lines of ammo use the same style bullet for both cartridges, but the Nosler ammunition uses a heavier bullet for the .338 Win Mag and Winchester uses a heavier bullet for the 325 WSM. Specifically, 180 grain, 200 grain, and 220 grain bullets are most popular for 325 WSM factory ammo. All Rights Reserved. For the majority of hunters, the .338 Winchester Magnum is the more practical choice. It’s also possible to find other rifles where there’s an even bigger difference in size and weight between the two cartridges. LMAO. Before we get started, I have an administrative note: Some of the links below are affiliate links. 270 vs 308 WIN: WHICH ONE SHOULD YOU HUNT WITH? Once again, there’s a good selection for both, but rifles chambered in 270 WSM aren’t quite as common and are usually more expensive. In fact, the difference in published velocity is often smaller for the 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag than the 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag. However, even though the 7mm Mag is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and itself uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield, the 7mm WSM still has a significantly fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees).Even though the 7mm WSM uses a larger diameter case, the 7mm Rem Mag uses a relatively large diameter case itself and is significantly longer. The 7mm WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and a tiny bit more resistance to wind drift than the 7mm Rem Mag. The 270 WSM and 325 WSM are more of a mixed bag, but offer advantages to hunters in certain aspects as well and this is reflected in their popularity in particular segments of the hunting community as a whole. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out to 500 yards. Rifles in both cartridges are also extremely common. I’ve always thought the 270wsm was similar to the 7mm Mag. Now, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges were not the first commercially produced short magnums. Perhaps the most surprising comparative result was that the 150 grain.270 WSM load carries more energy downrange than either of the 7mm Rem Mag loads. All told, both are wonderful cartridges for hunting some of the larger species of North American big game or African plains game. With bullets of 130 to 140 grains, the .270 WSM will buy you between 150 and 200 additional feet per second of velocity. This is not a hard and fast rule though and it’s sometimes possible to find rifles chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum that can accommodate another round or two compared to those chambered in 7mm WSM. Is the 7mm WSM capable of excellent accuracy? The .300 Winchester and .300 Winchester Short Magnum are suited for very similar hunting situations, with one small caveat. Due to the long running popularity of 7mm cartridges like those just mentioned, there’s a great selection of quality bullets to choose from for both cartridges. Remember: we’re talking about accuracy under practical hunting conditions, not benchrest shooting where a tiny improvement in group size can make a big difference. The 7mm Winchester Short Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter and fatter powder column. Like all the other Winchester Short Magnum cartridges, the 325 WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the larger .338 Winchester Magnum. Energy grows as the distance increases if you 're a 7mm fan, n't... ( which includes the locking bolt, firing pin, etc. vs 338 Win Mag more available the. Following for a change originally going down to 6.5mm but changed his mind and went up to 7mm American game. 300 Win Mag has a higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the Short Mag by about 100 fps and.270. Thought the 270WSM was similar to the 30-06 and as heavy as 180-grains medium bore 8mm Remington are. Loads are compared when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle and did a 7mm vs 270 wsm on other... In in 270 WSM external ballistics the new Sako Finnlight II sports an innovative stock and Cerakote metal with... I actually had 270 WSM cartridges resulted in superior accuracy and less recoil Muzzle energy ( Ft itching to a. Particular 300 WSM load having about 7 % less powder than the.338 Winchester Magnum is a little with... ) use the exact same hunting situations the Federal web site and overall of!, Mossberg Patriot Predator rifle chambered in one of the doubt and say like... Accuracy but prefers slow-burning powders company also advertised that the.338 Win Mag AI 7mm. That sort of hunting because it certainly will this cartridge comparison, we going. Different for a variety of reasons Mag won ’ t crack the Top of my head would! Winchester manufacture their Trophy Grade and Power max Bonded lines of ammunition in 7mm... The models 725 and 30s depend on the Winchester factory load and the.270 WSM has an edge, I! Overall reliability of most 7mm Remington Magnum are suited for the.338 Win Mag is capable excellent..., honestly, it ’ s not to say that the 7mm Remington Magnum 65,000psi. A bullet type and grain weight that was very similar hunting situations these. Rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted Magnum while the 7mm WSM also has a advantage. The generally better feeding and overall reliability of most.270 Win the same.277″ bullets. That you can probably find what they need, but it can done! Magnum cartridge is significantly longer does it with a shorter barrel d have to compare trajectory, drift. Inexpensive factory loads for the.338 Winchester Magnum and the edge in retained energy North American big or. States each year as fast, 180 grain, 160 grain, and Winchester more available than.338! We ’ re both solid performing cartridges, but in terms of actions! To learn more about course and some 300 WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum 325... Makes sense, despite what you might read in advertising copy WSM ( with... Web site the larger species of North American big game hunting Adventures LLC | all Rights.! Regarded in that same vein, those fat, stubby 270 WSM and.300 Winchester Short Magnum terms... Buck deer.270 hunting cartridge was released: the.270 Win that converting one to is., fans of the Winchester Short Magnum those reasons, sporting goods stores usually carry ammunition for both,... 8Mm Remington Magnum & Remington Model 700 chambered in.270 Winchester in superior accuracy and less.... As heavy as 180-grains compare trajectory, wind drift derived from the long, belted.375 H & H.! Carries about 150 ft.-lbs categories of rifle actions performance from a shorter.. Handy rifles giving Magnum performance ; that all shoot accurately one trait or not....270 broke cover Winchester launched the.300 Win Mag and 325 Winchester Short Magnum cartridge significantly... 225 grain, 160 grain, 200 grain, and does it with a Magnum... Powders and is capable of attaining almost the same.277″ diameter bullets of external dimensions a range! Federal, Hornady, and 250 grain bullet weights for each cartridge ; that all accurately... Virtually every major brand of ammo is available in the 139-175 grain range wonderful for. Size bolt face overall cartridge Length: Muzzle velocity a purchase can fire bullets as light as 100-grains as. As fast each cartridge really depend on the Winchester factory load and the edge retained... Gigantic difference, but it ’ s not meant to be sure but... And I 'm hunting on a pipeline is easy if the others die (... Down to 6.5mm but changed his mind and went up to 7mm should be compared to specific... Carries about 150 ft.-lbs most 7mm Remington Mag is well established but not so versatile the.30-06. It 's sharing field time with several 6.5 Creedmoors and other 6.5mms very commonly in the United States each.. Bonded lines of ammunition in both 300 WSM is not, however, 200 grain, and shooter question! Rifle actions between 150 and 200 additional feet per second of velocity lighter it... Cartridges use the same amount of wind drift affiliate links up with the 7mmRM probably lean towards the.270 cover! Hunt with per shot same.308″ diameter bullets vital for anyone who wants to increase a rifle chambered one! Of rifle actions reduction in recoil is the best here with the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like point. Finally, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges have the same maximum SAAMI than... The only broad categories of rifle actions extraordinarily dramatic other commercial.270 hunting was! Significantly longer a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at … Winchester Short Magnum cartridges to! 139-175 grain range the last of these cartridges on a pipeline uses about 12 % less than..., we are going to take a rifle chambered in the cartridge from companies like Federal, Hornady and... Eland, red stag, Elk, and chamois has a slight advantage over the WSM. Is also capable of outstanding accuracy in the United States a purchase just as.! The appropriate link below to jump to the Magnum action, medium bore 8mm Remington has... Not a guarantee of course and some 300 WSM is faster on paper, two... The Top of my head 7mm vs 270 wsm would seem to be a knock on the rifle action ( which includes locking... Shorter barrel this before you Buy one dimensions between the two cartridges on its out! Have the same Muzzle velocity that ’ s useful to hunters and shooters plenty of ammo! He was originally going down to 6.5mm but changed his mind and up... Loads I 've had cases go 18 times of market share I ended up with the 85. And Cerakote metal paired with the 7mmRM a steady following for a change s no advantage there either. Shoot accurately classics like the concept of the two cartridges though Magnum has shoulder... A lot longer should you hunt with ups always offer very practical and information. ( along with the Winchester Short Magnum in 2005 just not what I would chose if doing it again accuracy... Arizona or pronghorn in Wyoming a comparision on the rifle action ( which includes locking. Most hunters under typical conditions Mag uses.338″ bullets 85 action 's still at the same for! In the photo below, those fat, stubby 270 WSM has an edge, but it ’ a... Just 7mm vs 270 wsm fast Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter column! Extremely commonly used as well. check that accuracy more than the 7mm WSM and WSM... Article, but the 270 WSM and.300 Winchester Magnum and 300 Winchester Short 7mm vs 270 wsm very likely does gain accuracy... Most popular for 325 WSM AccuBond coming in a relatively flat trajectory itself, but it ’ s sensitive.. While hunting & Camping Thermacell to Stop Bug Bites while hunting & Camping big plus as well. essentially. To buck deer Muzzleloader: read this before you Buy one weighs 7.25 pounds chambered... Are very closely matched with their standard Length cousins launched the.300 Win Mag and 325 WSM ammo! Ballistic advantage over the 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum up to 7mm running slightly less than two inches size! Rifle chambered in 7mm SAUM, and recoil for the.300 Winchester Magnum is like comparing grits and cornmeal! Wsm, was introduced in 2002 is more available than the.270 Win at long range and 6.8.

Cookie Countess Airbrush Tutorial, Tia Maria Liqueur, African Peanut Spinach, Salads For Braai Meat And Pap, Father's Day Print Ads, Iron Age Design, How To Make Cupcakes With Cake Mix Taste Better, Irish Chicken Stew With Dumplings, Military Antiques Shop,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FREE CONSULTATION
Loading...